Welcome to Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures
Welcome to Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures by signing in or creating an account.
- Start new topics and reply to others
- Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
- Get your own profile page and make new friends
- Send personal messages to other members.
aTommy
-
Posts
3921 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by aTommy
-
gj fi nice pull
-
probably one of the most mature acting members from zenith on this board (or overall)
-
??
-
they both looks rly good tbh
-
honestly..
-
i'm ashamed to admit you were in the same clan as me.
-
sdb
-
very surprised fi
-
gj tlp
-
should have matched their cap
-
z
-
i like wilderness for the fact that it's where it matters, but clan wars is nice because you don't have crashing as an option.
-
BOOTED JOSH
-
night omni ty for pics
-
are you going to remove signature limits and handle them on a case by case basis (PLZ)
-
this is exactly the **** i was talking to you about, you make us look ******* retarded when you name yourself ******* turban and what colors of ******* turbans you like
-
can you put that picture in my signature and center it and delete the stupid **** thats in it now
-
you are a legend
-
will you make a sign with #tommy ?
-
If you did take a stance on non quested/quested/whatever addy in clans, would you stop clans from posting topics on pure warfare immediately, would you make them stop allowing adamant/wearing adamant on trips? FOE accepts turmoil, but requires them to wear monk robes (i think, or mith), would that be alright? I know you can't tell clans what to do on their trips but i'm just wondering.
-
what is your opinion of modern pk trips (hunt clans, hop, run ect.) do you believe it would be better if pk trips were to pk and fight clans? and also would pure warfare ever take a stance on a controversial subject (such as adamant, HF posting topics here ect.) and if you were, would you dissallow pure clans that do that which the stance is placed on (like having 30 def) would you also disbar them from this site?
-
do you believe there is a better alternative to the 15% rule than what the current rule is?
-
when/is pure warfare going to make a stance as a community leader on the ending level of defence (ex, 40)
-
what is your opinion on machelle bachman running for republican nomniation
-
are you going to join nme with the rest of pw staff
