Jump to content

Welcome to Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures

Welcome to Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.

Ben√

Elite Member
  • Posts

    2553
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Ben√

  1. Guess you finally learnt salmon isn't good enough! :P
  2. I don't understand why people say we've got 'beef' with EF. We posted our version of Saturday and they posted theirs. Judging by their response on ours I'd say they don't like us :(. On the whole, this full out should be fun, after all, that's the intention it was accepted on as opposed to "getting one over" the opponants.
  3. Any Enemy caught flaming on this topic will be punished. I posted this purely for entertainment purposes haha
  4. I wasn't there, but I was told your entire team was 80+.
  5. Due to our recent requirement change (65-85 cmb 10> defence) we decided to try out a lil bit of P2P. So far we've had 3 P2P minis vs NWO, Z and TB. We managed to beat Z + TB, 2-1, while losing NWO. Please note, like 50% of us had overs and were using rune scims lmfao (I DID NOT PICK THE MUSIC)
  6. O god of the aftermath topic makers, please return soon! Oh **** my signature. I think OIdwildy has by far taken my spot.. or who ever wrote the last NME weekend aftermath topic. 200+ replies speak for itself. I'll be back.. soon. OIdwildy got skill, but you're something else. I'll be looking forward to your return, sir. You flatter me kind sir. I hope to live up to what you expect. I hear there are a few new rules for topic making. Soz, I've taken over in this department. :wub:
  7. We're not going to go above the 10 defence cap for a long time, even if the combat cap is removed. Ah no that's not what I meant at all, I love how you guys say no to mithril, but I was thinking to myself; What attack level is needed on a maxed 10 def pure to achieve 85 combat? O, 60 with 52 prayer and 10 defence. Really now? Hmmm, Then I retract my statement. I was pretty sure it was going to be 70+ Does this mean you guys will start doing P2P on regular base? Seeing how you're no longer 50 attack capped. (and obviously with smithe being accepted) We've had 3 P2P minis against the likes of TB, NWO and Z since, beating TB + Z :).
  8. We're not going to go above the 10 defence cap for a long time, even if the combat cap is removed. Ah no that's not what I meant at all, I love how you guys say no to mithril, but I was thinking to myself; What attack level is needed on a maxed 10 def pure to achieve 85 combat? O, 60 with 52 prayer and 10 defence.
  9. We're not going to go above the 10 defence cap for a long time, even if the combat cap is removed.
  10. Looks good, and it shows how far we've already come.
  11. I think both will pull more, seeing as Enemy pulled 39 to their last Saturday, so they might pull up to 50 for fullout, malice can probably pull a good 40. I doubt it, this event is a bit of fun where as trips are srsbzns. So i'd be extremely happy with a 40 pull. That isn't to say I don't want to win though.
  12. Its always been for you Ben.... dont you see? Aww man, never knew you cared soo much :wub:
  13. Thank you for bumping up our topic, it's appricated.
  14. It's wrong, simple as. Idiots use the excuse that times are changing but still base their clans on their old morales, posting on a website which has a slogan, "home of the defenceless.." Its come to the point that clan leaders are calling Enemy pathetic for suggesting an idea like this in the clan leader section as we don't allow mithril or addy ourselves.
  15. First topic to reach 3.5K Views in a while, looks like it's doing its job. We raped hard, the fact that EF declined all our PKRIs and felt the need to crash a clean 1 vs 1 fight is only evidence of that ;).
  16. Na, we discovered EF only used the cape colours as an excuse to crash. When they realised ownage the green team was, they called for the green cape clan WAR to help them, which went against their original reason to crash. :thumbsup:
  17. Heard they tried to call our green friends WAR :(.
  18. Holy **** lmao, so not only did you need to call Outrage, but you were also calling WAR? O damn, we own.
  19. Was a fun trip, thanks for posting the topic Scott. *EDIT* 129 replies 1,899views. omg nearly 2k people seen my beautiful topix. nvm its probably just eugune constantly refreshing.
  20. We (Enemy, and no, were weren't with Malice) never crashed, we heard that EF were in that world and started to look for them. Unfortunately, we walked into you, not one person attacked. We began to walk south even before you started to attack so I'm not sure how you can say it was a crash. None the less, good job on the rest of your trip.
×
  • Create New...