Jump to content

Welcome to Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures

Welcome to Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.

Mark

Elite Member
  • Posts

    1979
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mark

  1. Sounds like a **** poor excuse to be lazy and not fix it
  2. I can agree to this statement by one of the song artists which she illegally downloaded; http://mashable.com/2009/06/24/richard-marx-riaa/
  3. this i think they are scared no matter what the rules Or you guys could just negotiate rules? I didn't really get the whole "non-negotiable" thing personally :laugh:
  4. You're absolutely right, FOE's every loss can be narrowed down to a single deciding factor... spies! Thanks for clearing that up Walli
  5. Mark

    LIN PK VIDEO

    Jack X2yz made it
  6. These 2 Malice trips, back when we pulled in the 60s to F2P trips and smashed clans 2v1 on the regular
  7. Why 20 defense cap? We are pures. And ye, Id like to war MM in P2P soon. So bring it on leaders of Foe/MM ;) Or just bring me a war in general, way to few wars in the pure world atm. :mellow: I'd love 1 defense cap. I was just under the impression that most clans preferred 20
  8. I wouldn't mind seeing: MM vs FOE -P2P Clanwars -Matched opts -Summon off -20 Defense cap -Dung on -Corrupt on -Overloads on -Classic arena
  9. Nice job TLP. Good to see you stepping up in F2P
  10. Nice idea for an event CPR, great job bringing the community together
  11. Congratulations to all those promoted
  12. You mean the posts where you were stirring up **** with other clans unprovoked and for no good reason?
  13. I take this into consideration while moderating. However, it poses a problem when someone responds to that criticism with flame. It's better to remove both comments than risk moderating only 1 side of an argument. It has become apparent that not many people frequenting these forums can handle constructive criticism, otherwise you might see a different community than what you know now.
×
  • Create New...