Jump to content

Welcome to Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures

Welcome to Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.

lazypker61

Member
  • Posts

    59
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About lazypker61

lazypker61's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. Most people in the pure community haven't liked this game for a while and continued to play because of their clans. The EOC is just the perfect excuse to call it quits.
  2. MM gets a full re bank and clears us after we fought without banking for 40 mins and complains when we don't come back to fight them down 60 with CP and Zenith sniping us.
  3. Mm and foe both re banked and remassed before we decided to leave. It was great fun.
  4. 4 year slump and you put fi 2nd on both lists. :O!!! F2P ranking is correct, when we were #1 we were untouchable. MM nor FOE EVER had that in f2p. P2P is incorrect FOE/MM should be tie for #1.
  5. Calls entire forum guest to come onto pk trip, because you can't compete with Fi. I guess you do what you gotta do to compete.
  6. I only rank them by the times they were on the top 2-3 F2P 1. MM- Most consistent, never really lost top 3 at any point 2. FI- 2 Years of slump but 4 years of absolute dominance place them there. 3. FOE-In middle of the pack, always in it, never really dominate 4. EOP- was a good for 1-2 year, too inconsistent to put above any of above 5. CP/TLP- CP was good in the past, TLP a bit more consistent 6. E- One period of decent dominance, but since they close you can't rank them high P2P 1. MM/FOE- Fairly tie, MM with consistency, but FOE had absolute dominance for much of P2P era 3. FI- More consistent than TLP 4. TLP- Never really had the pulls to be the top at any point but very consistent No other clan really had much of history in p2p for an extended period of time.
  7. Thanks for all the fights today foe :thumbsup: You guys got really unlucky when you teled in the at the same time as us at gdz lol.
  8. We left the first fight with 64 in range more than what eop had on the field. I love the chat box where 2 of our members were screaming that they didn't have 57 wc We clear 90 percent of you at one point while we never dip below 43 No one is buying your bs.
  9. You had 88-90 on rush while the video clearly shows we had 73-74 on rush then gain people during the fight peaking at 80. No one is buying your bs.
  10. wonder why you cover the chatbox :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
  11. 14 kills :) TY for the fights EOP and MM
  12. 1. Fi- scared everyone off. 2. MM- Same opts as Fi yet ran to clanwars :down: 3. Foe- got beaten by mm - Gap 4. Tlp 5. Zenith 6. Eop
  13. Shh. there's no room for reality in Eop's dream world.
×
  • Create New...