Is 100vs100 a good idea on p2p plateau?

[Manaana]

At least everybody knows who the real Kings of p2p are now.

 

Yeh I guess so

[Mark]

Declare on MM, your rules. See if they accept.

this

 

i think they are scared no matter what the rules

 

 

Or you guys could just negotiate rules? I didn't really get the whole "non-negotiable" thing personally :laugh:

[Ayo Loki]

FOE should've just accepted plat. That will be a huge cluster ****, and FOE is known for having a **** ton of barragers

[Manaana]

FOE should've just accepted plat. That will be a huge cluster ****, and FOE is known for having a **** ton of barragers

 

Lol.

[Jack-x2yz]

FOE should've just accepted plat. That will be a huge cluster ****, and FOE is known for having a **** ton of barragers

 

Lol.

This is true...

[Manaana]

FOE should've just accepted plat. That will be a huge cluster ****, and FOE is known for having a **** ton of barragers

 

Lol.

This is true...

 

I wouldn't be happy with a win on plateau anyway. Besides, it wouldn't be any fun at all, I play to have fun.

[Zer0]

nah lol. easy to get clump up in 35 vs 35, imagine 100 vs 100 lol...

 

turrets > classic > plateau for large scale wars imo

[Taze]

nah lol. easy to get clump up in 35 vs 35, imagine 100 vs 100 lol...

 

turrets > classic > plateau for large scale wars imo

[Kyle]

I dunno plateau is too small and I think turrets is way too big and has too many question marks not to mention mm has had like one fight ever on it and foe has had countless wars on it. I dunno I've just always hated turrets as well always turns into a mess. Classic is also too small though to be honest and would probably end up as a standoff because the clan who goes in the middle will get clumped and fighting away from the middle will be a mess as well with the "defending" clan hiding behind the trees forcing the attacking clan into a massive clump.

[`Peter]

you guys should all stay in a dd and attack each other

[Art]

implying your clan will pull 100

[CkngMama]

Is that an excuse, coming from a FOE member? lolllll

 

It would be the same situation for both clans.

[Manaana]

I dunno plateau is too small and I think turrets is way too big and has too many question marks not to mention mm has had like one fight ever on it and foe has had countless wars on it. I dunno I've just always hated turrets as well always turns into a mess. Classic is also too small though to be honest and would probably end up as a standoff because the clan who goes in the middle will get clumped and fighting away from the middle will be a mess as well with the "defending" clan hiding behind the trees forcing the attacking clan into a massive clump.

 

Thankyou, I agree for the most part, although I'm sure leaders can be creative and break the stalemate for classic.

[Nhing]

Still so surprised that Jagex haven't re-sized any of the arena's after the Jagex cup and such.

[Manaana]

Still so surprised that Jagex haven't re-sized any of the arena's after the Jagex cup and such.

 

 

And the cc limit....fwuk.

[Evan]

Spam Chins and Barrages Hi5

[Pur3_Kide]

Dv vs TLP 3rounds plateau was about 70 vs 75 or something, no problems.

 

Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UihQmoVNZeU

 

[walli]

Dv vs TLP 3rounds plateau was about 70 vs 75 or something, no problems.

 

Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UihQmoVNZeU

 

 

 

the vid kinda shows the point all he does is autocast all the way thru it and every1 is just clumped lol

 

and yea alex jagex r dumb... on rs leader forums i asked about cc and they claimed wasnt worth it because only a couple of clans on rs can pull that many people...

[Mark]

and yea alex jagex r dumb... on rs leader forums i asked about cc and they claimed wasnt worth it because only a couple of clans on rs can pull that many people...

 

 

Sounds like a **** poor excuse to be lazy and not fix it

[walli]

Also like why when i asked them about making bigger maps they came back with the same excuse, and then when asking why they dont give us more pvp worlds or implicate the bh wild system into every world they simply said.

 

"are you going to pay for it"

 

Basically they said it costs too much to host pvp worlds and bh worlds and would cost too much to put it into all the worlds. They claimed they would do it if there was enough demand for it, but they said over the current worlds there is not enough people using them all the time to show demand for more worlds.

 

=[

[Mich-ae-l]

and yea alex jagex r dumb... on rs leader forums i asked about cc and they claimed wasnt worth it because only a couple of clans on rs can pull that many people...

 

 

Sounds like a **** poor excuse to be lazy and not fix it

 

Ya it does lol.

[Jusc]

It is difficult, but I think it is possible. I wondering how it would look (think) :)

[Failed Again]

lol what kind of idiot would even suggest this?

 

O

[Kruckcrusher]

I only disagree with 2 of the rules

Which is one round and on plat? I would rather have 3 turrent as it a large enough map to do a 100v100

Also I think the war should be on a Sunday as Sunday is p2p for the pure world not Saturday.

[Jack-x2yz]

Also like why when i asked them about making bigger maps they came back with the same excuse, and then when asking why they dont give us more pvp worlds or implicate the bh wild system into every world they simply said.

 

"are you going to pay for it"

 

Basically they said it costs too much to host pvp worlds and bh worlds and would cost too much to put it into all the worlds. They claimed they would do it if there was enough demand for it, but they said over the current worlds there is not enough people using them all the time to show demand for more worlds.

 

=[

Link them to this topic and just say "all we ask for is a huge green field with nothing on it..." surly a good company would be able to create that without much hassle... Then again this is Jagex were talking about.