LPC

[EOPCUHH]

Do you guys think the acronym for LPC has changed from

Lowlevel Pure clan to Low Pulling clan

 

Since all these clans that pull so low always call themselves " LPC " yet they have plenty of 70s, 80s, and 90s in their clans.

 

Discuss! :teehee:

[`Pure]

It's been like that since clan wars.

[Akahana]

cuhhh:

what white people call each other when they try to act black

[Hugh]

#Negative you idiot

[Scotts Law]

I don't think there should be an acronym to distinguish between pure clans. The #1 "LPC" should just man up and take the rank of #20 pure clan or whatever they are equal to.

[AndyIbeat]

Wouldn't categorise us. I'd just say Negative has a lot lower average cb level than most clans, and doesn't pull as much as some clans.

[EOPCUHH]

Wouldn't categorise us. I'd just say Negative has a lot lower average cb level than most clans, and doesn't pull as much as some clans.

Negative is a low level clan but theres clans like EF who run around with their 70s in addy berserker shields (35 Def) and level 80s/90s on their ml :verymad:

[Keith]

Just clans that pull lower. As Pure' said, it's been like that for a while ;). I know I made a pretty in depth post on it a year or two ago.

[cx ftw yes]

true say

[Mafia]

Negative is a great clan. Check us out sometime.

[penguinz0]

Low Level (45-70?) Pure Clan?

[Waldo]

Hopefully people become more interested in true LPC clanning soon. I think it's the closest we're gonna get to old wildy pking.

[Prateek]

I don't think there should be an acronym to distinguish between pure clans. The #1 "LPC" should just man up and take the rank of #20 pure clan or whatever they are equal to.

So you're saying that people who choose to pk together at low lvl are automatically worse than people who choose to pk at a higher level?

 

OT: The LPC scene at the moment is definitely not where it's suppose to be, but I have a feeling it will be getting better. Let's keep calling it Lowlevel Pure Clans :).

[Mafia]

Well, 12 "LPC" clans have opened over the past two weeks alone. I imagine half will close by April's end, so we may see a good bit of activity from them. (Maybe as much as there was in January)

[Tim-]

EF should be categorized as MPC.

[hippy]

[09:54] <@[EF]hippy> .ml negative

 

[09:54] -[TB]RuneScript- *** [ CLAN ]: [-] Negative (http://www.negative-rs.com/) | Members: 55 | Type: F2P & P2P | Time: worldwide | Homeworld: 61 | [Averages] Cmb: 63.93/64.8; Str: 69.71; Cns: 71.6; Mage: 81.65; Range: 81.09; Overall: 656 | Last Update: 15th Apr 2011

 

[09:54] <@[EF]hippy> .ml ef

 

[09:54] -[TB]RuneScript- *** [ CLAN ]: [EF] Exiled Force (http://exiledforce.b1.jcink.com) | Members: 51 | Type: F2P | Time: Not Set | Cape: Wilderness9 | Homeworld: 167 | [Averages] Cmb: 63.96/64.81; Str: 78.31; Cns: 63.76; Mage: 77.82; Range: 78.31; Overall: 622 | Last Update: 15th Apr 2011

 

 

Im sure if you dont consider my clan an LPC and you consider negative a LPC then i dont know what to say.Perhaps your in some form of mental rehab?

 

We have two 80s in our clan, these are there f2p combats : I_M_A_Lemon 82cb and Speciez 80cb

Also i dont think i need to go beyound this to prove my point since i have seen a 90 and few 80s in negatives trip also :)

 

 

 

Conclusion : my Clan is an LPC.

[20bag]

[09:54] <@[EF]hippy> .ml negative

 

[09:54] -[TB]RuneScript- *** [ CLAN ]: [-] Negative (http://www.negative-rs.com/) | Members: 55 | Type: F2P & P2P | Time: worldwide | Homeworld: 61 | [Averages] Cmb: 63.93/64.8; Str: 69.71; Cns: 71.6; Mage: 81.65; Range: 81.09; Overall: 656 | Last Update: 15th Apr 2011

 

[09:54] <@[EF]hippy> .ml ef

 

[09:54] -[TB]RuneScript- *** [ CLAN ]: [EF] Exiled Force (http://exiledforce.b1.jcink.com) | Members: 51 | Type: F2P | Time: Not Set | Cape: Wilderness9 | Homeworld: 167 | [Averages] Cmb: 63.96/64.81; Str: 78.31; Cns: 63.76; Mage: 77.82; Range: 78.31; Overall: 622 | Last Update: 15th Apr 2011

 

 

Im sure if you dont consider my clan an LPC and you consider negative a LPC then i dont know what to say.Perhaps your in some form of mental rehab?

 

We have two 80s in our clan, these are there f2p combats : I_M_A_Lemon 82cb and Speciez 80cb

Also i dont think i need to go beyound this to prove my point since i have seen a 90 and few 80s in negatives trip also :)

 

 

 

Conclusion : my Clan is an LPC.

 

 

I'd feel stupid if I posted something about negative being more of an LPC than us l0l.... Cya hicks....

 

Anyhow, it is mostly 'low pulling clans' now-a-days but I'd say we are fairly low level'd having 1-3 members over 80 combat.... but hey haters gonna hate let em hate and watch the wins pile up :D

 

Wouldn't categorise us. I'd just say Negative has a lot lower average cb level than most clans, and doesn't pull as much as some clans.

Negative is a low level clan but theres clans like EF who run around with their 70s in addy berserker shields (35 Def) and level 80s/90s on their ml :verymad:

 

EoP has the right to talk about anyone elses Defence levels since when?

[Taze]

Resurgence.

[20bag]

Resurgence.

who?

[Sings]

Exiled Force = lpc

Replusive = lpc

Negative = lpc

Bloody Vikingz = lpc with 30 def requirement.

[Scotts Law]

I don't think there should be an acronym to distinguish between pure clans. The #1 "LPC" should just man up and take the rank of #20 pure clan or whatever they are equal to.

So you're saying that people who choose to pk together at low lvl are automatically worse than people who choose to pk at a higher level?

 

OT: The LPC scene at the moment is definitely not where it's suppose to be, but I have a feeling it will be getting better. Let's keep calling it Lowlevel Pure Clans :).

 

No Prateek, not at all.

 

I'm saying it forms an imaginary barrier which gives lower clans the impression that they are the best at something, thus making them want to stay at that level forever and never improving. I mean, who wants to go from #1 LPC to #6 MPC?

[20bag]

I don't think there should be an acronym to distinguish between pure clans. The #1 "LPC" should just man up and take the rank of #20 pure clan or whatever they are equal to.

So you're saying that people who choose to pk together at low lvl are automatically worse than people who choose to pk at a higher level?

 

OT: The LPC scene at the moment is definitely not where it's suppose to be, but I have a feeling it will be getting better. Let's keep calling it Lowlevel Pure Clans :).

 

No Prateek, not at all.

 

I'm saying it forms an imaginary barrier which gives lower clans the impression that they are the best at something, thus making them want to stay at that level forever and never improving. I mean, who wants to go from #1 LPC to #6 MPC?

 

 

We do :D we are training very hard and preparing to make our move, we just need some more time, especially with things being as boring as they have been in the LPC bracket.

 

 

@sings I think Replusive is a self proclaimed MPC; at least I hope so.

[hippy]

MPC is full of 20 def which dosn't look too fun and i hate p2p :)

[AndyIbeat]

[09:54] <@[EF]hippy> .ml negative

 

[09:54] -[TB]RuneScript- *** [ CLAN ]: [-] Negative (http://www.negative-rs.com/) | Members: 55 | Type: F2P & P2P | Time: worldwide | Homeworld: 61 | [Averages] Cmb: 63.93/64.8; Str: 69.71; Cns: 71.6; Mage: 81.65; Range: 81.09; Overall: 656 | Last Update: 15th Apr 2011

 

[09:54] <@[EF]hippy> .ml ef

 

[09:54] -[TB]RuneScript- *** [ CLAN ]: [EF] Exiled Force (http://exiledforce.b1.jcink.com) | Members: 51 | Type: F2P | Time: Not Set | Cape: Wilderness9 | Homeworld: 167 | [Averages] Cmb: 63.96/64.81; Str: 78.31; Cns: 63.76; Mage: 77.82; Range: 78.31; Overall: 622 | Last Update: 15th Apr 2011

 

 

Im sure if you dont consider my clan an LPC and you consider negative a LPC then i dont know what to say.Perhaps your in some form of mental rehab?

 

We have two 80s in our clan, these are there f2p combats : I_M_A_Lemon 82cb and Speciez 80cb

Also i dont think i need to go beyound this to prove my point since i have seen a 90 and few 80s in negatives trip also :)

 

 

 

Conclusion : my Clan is an MPC.

 

 

You havn't seen any 90's dawg.

[Elcangry]

[09:54] <@[EF]hippy> .ml negative

 

[09:54] -[TB]RuneScript- *** [ CLAN ]: [-] Negative (http://www.negative-rs.com/) | Members: 55 | Type: F2P & P2P | Time: worldwide | Homeworld: 61 | [Averages] Cmb: 63.93/64.8; Str: 69.71; Cns: 71.6; Mage: 81.65; Range: 81.09; Overall: 656 | Last Update: 15th Apr 2011

 

[09:54] <@[EF]hippy> .ml ef

 

[09:54] -[TB]RuneScript- *** [ CLAN ]: [EF] Exiled Force (http://exiledforce.b1.jcink.com) | Members: 51 | Type: F2P | Time: Not Set | Cape: Wilderness9 | Homeworld: 167 | [Averages] Cmb: 63.96/64.81; Str: 78.31; Cns: 63.76; Mage: 77.82; Range: 78.31; Overall: 622 | Last Update: 15th Apr 2011

 

 

Im sure if you dont consider my clan an LPC and you consider negative a LPC then i dont know what to say.Perhaps your in some form of mental rehab?

 

We have two 80s in our clan, these are there f2p combats : I_M_A_Lemon 82cb and Speciez 80cb

Also i dont think i need to go beyound this to prove my point since i have seen a 90 and few 80s in negatives trip also :)

 

 

 

Conclusion : my Clan is an LPC.

 

I don't know if anyone has told you, and if you don't already know this it makes me wonder how you're ranked in a clan, but when defence isn't ranked on the highscores, it isn't factored into the combats by runehead.

 

Thus the original point that he made about EF having lots of mith and addy (I don't know nor care if its true or not) is actually completely irrelevant to the point you made.

 

Perhaps your in some form of mental rehab?

 

Also that was just terrible.