is eop a pure clan?

[yo boy jd]

:ninja:

[Bad Kangaroo]

inb4close

[Braden]

I say no due to pures have always had a low level of defence, 25 is alright but 30... Just get the extra 15 for a zerker ATLEAST

[Tonkatruckin]

30 def with turmoil is more "pure" than 20 defence unquested, or 23 unquested like korrawi.

 

So i would have to say EoP are as "pure" as any other clan in this community, which is none because 20 defence isn't pure.

[Archbishop]

lol, why bother posting

 

inb4lock/close

[Grifte]

There are no pure clans, seeing every clan accepts 10+ def

[Xpnkrockemox]

I guess all clans arent pure clans anymore.

[BarrageKyle]

trolololo

[Kyle]

30 def with turmoil is more "pure" than 20 defence unquested, or 23 unquested like korrawi.

 

So i would have to say EoP are as "pure" as any other clan in this community, which is none because 20 defence isn't pure.

wut about the kids in your clan with 35+ def unquested? are they still pures?

[Willy]

u guys just mad u cant wear rune like eop

[aTommy]

i'd honestly like to see the debate on this because it's basicly a "30 defence pure" topic. in my oponion it is more pure and 20 because it actually provides turmoil, ss ect that are more offensive than the adamant/mithril. but I think it's a case of where you draw the line because Rune offers Vencence and all of those spells.

 

 

 

30 def with turmoil is more "pure" than 20 defence unquested, or 23 unquested like korrawi.

 

So i would have to say EoP are as "pure" as any other clan in this community, which is none because 20 defence isn't pure.

wut about the kids in your clan with 35+ def unquested? are they still pures?

 

i don't think any defence that is quested should be considered "pure" and solo was saying something about making no unquested defence alowed.

[Bad Kangaroo]

There are no pure clans, seeing every clan accepts 10+ def

You said it was disgraceful when foe started accepting 30 def, I know this because you pmd me it personally lmfao... before that foe were considering themself pure but since you accept 30 def now there's no such thing? come on grifte.

[I_Sh00t_U_I]

still not locked! lol rather interesting vote outcome :whistling:

[Azrael]

No, because they accept 20 defence.

[Tonkatruckin]

30 def with turmoil is more "pure" than 20 defence unquested, or 23 unquested like korrawi.

 

So i would have to say EoP are as "pure" as any other clan in this community, which is none because 20 defence isn't pure.

wut about the kids in your clan with 35+ def unquested? are they still pures?

 

Did you even read what i said? i said 20 defence isn't pure so obviously 35 defence isn't either.

 

Your clan isn't pure and neither is mine, you had like 50% kids with 20 def at that prep against Fatality midweek.

 

Stop accepting 20 def and i might have some respect for MM, but until then i just see you guys as hypocrites non-stop chatting **** about clans that allow 30 when you allow mains into your clan as well.

[Mafia]

There are no pure clans, seeing every clan accepts 10+ def

Not every clan :x

[Lawson]

Topic still going strong

[`Pure]

i'd honestly like to see the debate on this because it's basicly a "30 defence pure" topic. in my oponion it is more pure and 20 because it actually provides turmoil, ss ect that are more offensive than the adamant/mithril. but I think it's a case of where you draw the line because Rune offers Vencence and all of those spells.

 

 

 

30 def with turmoil is more "pure" than 20 defence unquested, or 23 unquested like korrawi.

 

So i would have to say EoP are as "pure" as any other clan in this community, which is none because 20 defence isn't pure.

wut about the kids in your clan with 35+ def unquested? are they still pures?

 

i don't think any defence that is quested should be considered "pure" and solo was saying something about making no unquested defence alowed.

If people actually have properly quested 30 defense then it isn't bad to me. It's the ones that get it just for the addy that need to stop breathing.

[StrikeTeam]

39 def is newschool pures l0l

[Dirty Wobble]

Um yes..

[Josh--]

lol

[Skillzy]

Why...?

[Mitch]

2011

[Arrow]

First id like to say hi to my man STEVO aka BAD KANGAROO. (auto accept my baby pure in your clan plz and ty)

 

Legend.

 

Now id like to go on to call out and insult almost everyone on these forums.

 

To begin the neoclassical definition of PURE was 1-20 Def. Thats what it was in 2006 when I was pure, and thats what it will be in 2011. HOWEVER, the definer of PURE must of been the same average age as most of the users of this forum as there is NOTHING pure about 10+ defense, unless you use a more encompassing view of the word Pure, in which case there are wayyyy more PURES then you think. Here is my reasoning.

 

SOME PURES get 20 DEFENSE for the use of the following Initiate Armour with the below bonuses. Notice the Bonuses of the 3 Piece Set up. (Mithril Kite Shield, Climbing boots, etc are left out of the bonus to maintain consistency).

 

 

THE 30 DEF PURES, (Turmoil Pures or Old School Pures that ****** up their defense big time)

 

The following armour is Prosylyte (**** up on spelling) and once again only the 3 piece set, Addy kite, and climbers are not apart of the bonuses to maintain consistency.

 

 

IF YOU NOTICE THE BONUSES ARE ALMOST EXACTLY THE ******* SAME? Amazing Amirite? so an additional +30 in each in a few defensive stats + 2% and +4% in damage absorption is the deal breaker?

 

Or is it the access to the Curses Prayer book that makes one go from Pure to Main?

 

If its access to the Curses and not the gear thats the deal breaker, then I guess we would then need to encompass the Almighty RUNE PURE, into a definition of Being Pure. I mean hey lets look at the bonuses of Proslyte in comparison to a Rune Full, Rune Plate (Quested item may I add to the posters above me ;) ) and Rune Plate Legs.

 

Rune Full:

Rune Plate:

Rune Platelegs:

 

FOR A TOTAL OF:

 

163, 161, 146, -11, and 159 (summoning not included and if you cant figure out why stop reading)

 

So is this +40 on 30 Defense Pures the deal Breaker from what is pure and what is not.

 

Before you answer that question.. THINK. If the +30 from 20-30 wasn't the deal breaker, but the curses were. Then HOW is the +40 from 30-40 the deal breaker, when both accounts in fact have the curses. (I know I know mind blowing stuff.. When I heard it.. I spent 45 minutes on the toilet too.)

 

If you notice I am mocking and or highlighting what is called "THE SLIPPERY SLOPE" aka once you begin trying to define any amount of defense as pure, its very easy to rationalize and or generalize that alot of defense options are pure.

 

What I am trying to get at, is in all honesty the ONLY reason why 20 defense is considered pure is because that is the neoclassical definition of Pure from the beginning pure clans who set the stage to consider what is and what is not pure. The excuse of its 2011 is not valid enough to then include 30 def, or 40 def options into that list.

 

Rune Pures are not PURES in the same liking that 1-10 def pures are. However I do still consider them "pure" under the more relaxed definition, as do I consider 30 def pures under that relaxed definition as well.

 

To some this up to a point of understanding. The ONLY "PURE" CLANS are clans that are really 10-20 def and under. But any clan that allows turmoil pures/30 def pures etc aka some of the more prominent pure clans on this forum cannot really call out any of the 40 DEF PURE CLANS as they are practically the same and their generalizations of what is pure and what is not is a double edged sword that ultimately shows the fallacies in their logic.

 

- Arrow.

 

Reply with some raging post about how your a pure if your really mad

[S U W 0 0 P]

Arrow, you wasted ur time posting that.

 

Just sayin.