RAW List (Re-Posted)

[Aidan]

10 def;-)

[Turf]

Why would you restrict clans in a war thats supposed to display their complete strength?

 

If you beat a clan in a 1 def war then go out into the wilderness where there are no defence caps and get smacked, how does that make you a better clan, or one deserving of being higher on the rankings?

 

If you're going to give it 1 defence cap may as well call it 1 Def rankings, because a complete ranking system wouldn't restrict clans from using what they have.

 

Same goes for curses/dung/summoning/corrupts etc etc.

 

inb4 clan A gets a ml of everyone in 40 def, calls themselves rune pure clan, wrecks everyone in wild, calls themselves #1 pureclan

 

Obviously we wouldn't allow zerk clans into the ranking systems anyway.

 

but then again, according to the RSC and Jagex tournaments, they're pure clans anyway.

zerkers are pures too, it's 2011.

[Excellence]

Are the fights matched or full-out? I didn't see that stated anywhere in the rules/topic.

 

10 Def cap would be the most suitable.

 

I support if def cap is changed.

[Big]

i support, lol at the nerds saying no.. its just for fun stop being ****? its just for fun dont be scared to lose u little panzy ass bitches

[Big]

OT: i dont think the higher clans really care about a list, i guess it would be fun for smaller clans as they get entertained by a number

 

Dude the higher lvl clans care more about being #1 wtf u on about kid

[Azrael]

Are the fights matched or full-out? I didn't see that stated anywhere in the rules/topic.

 

10 Def cap would be the most suitable.

 

I support if def cap is changed.

PCR wars were full outs. Matched wars might as well be preps.

[Turf]

this won't work, just look at the people fighting over the rules already. But can't blame you for trying to get wars going.. but certain clans are too scared to war.. :s

[Tonka Forever]

this won't work, just look at the people fighting over the rules already. But can't blame you for trying to get wars going.. but certain clans are too scared to war.. :s

 

Didn't your clan just decline a P2P fullout with FOE because "100v100 isn't fullout"?

 

For a clan that brags about their 3 100v100 "fullout" wins last year nonstop, seems like FOE aren't the ones full of excuses anymore.

[Azrael]

this won't work, just look at the people fighting over the rules already. But can't blame you for trying to get wars going.. but certain clans are too scared to war.. :s

 

Didn't your clan just decline a P2P fullout with FOE because "100v100 isn't fullout"?

 

For a clan that brags about their 3 100v100 "fullout" wins last year nonstop, seems like FOE aren't the ones full of excuses anymore.

Zing.

[Veta]

I agree with everything besides the 20 def. In my opinion it should be 1 def, great topic poke.

[Patrick]

I don't understand , its seem everything p0ke or any other intelligent person on this forum brings a good idea to a table . THERE ALWAYS HAS TO BE SOMETHING WRONG WITH IT. Its sad....

[Azrael]

I agree with everything besides the 20 def. In my opinion it should be 1 def, great topic poke.

in the old PCR list, the rules were negotiated, including defence. 10 defence was when no one could agree.

[Turf]

this won't work, just look at the people fighting over the rules already. But can't blame you for trying to get wars going.. but certain clans are too scared to war.. :s

 

Didn't your clan just decline a P2P fullout with FOE because "100v100 isn't fullout"?

 

For a clan that brags about their 3 100v100 "fullout" wins last year nonstop, seems like FOE aren't the ones full of excuses anymore.

what? where are you going with this lol? If clans can pull over 100 and if it's capped at 100.. it's not a full out. Our past wars with FOE, neither clan was pulling much over 100 so the cap wasn't that big of a deal. It's different now.

[Tonka Forever]

this won't work, just look at the people fighting over the rules already. But can't blame you for trying to get wars going.. but certain clans are too scared to war.. :s

 

Didn't your clan just decline a P2P fullout with FOE because "100v100 isn't fullout"?

 

For a clan that brags about their 3 100v100 "fullout" wins last year nonstop, seems like FOE aren't the ones full of excuses anymore.

what? where are you going with this lol? If clans can pull over 100 and if it's capped at 100.. it's not a full out. Our past wars with FOE, neither clan was pulling much over 100 so the cap wasn't that big of a deal. It's different now.

 

pretty sure each clan had to sit a few, so it wasnt a fullout

 

but gratz on ur 3 matched prep wins last year.

[Azrael]

this won't work, just look at the people fighting over the rules already. But can't blame you for trying to get wars going.. but certain clans are too scared to war.. :s

 

Didn't your clan just decline a P2P fullout with FOE because "100v100 isn't fullout"?

 

For a clan that brags about their 3 100v100 "fullout" wins last year nonstop, seems like FOE aren't the ones full of excuses anymore.

what? where are you going with this lol? If clans can pull over 100 and if it's capped at 100.. it's not a full out. Our past wars with FOE, neither clan was pulling much over 100 so the cap wasn't that big of a deal. It's different now.

 

pretty sure each clan had to sit a few, so it wasnt a fullout

 

but gratz on ur 3 matched prep wins last year.

I seriously love you.

[Turf]

this won't work, just look at the people fighting over the rules already. But can't blame you for trying to get wars going.. but certain clans are too scared to war.. :s

 

Didn't your clan just decline a P2P fullout with FOE because "100v100 isn't fullout"?

 

For a clan that brags about their 3 100v100 "fullout" wins last year nonstop, seems like FOE aren't the ones full of excuses anymore.

what? where are you going with this lol? If clans can pull over 100 and if it's capped at 100.. it's not a full out. Our past wars with FOE, neither clan was pulling much over 100 so the cap wasn't that big of a deal. It's different now.

 

pretty sure each clan had to sit a few, so it wasnt a fullout

 

but gratz on ur 3 matched prep wins last year.

last year, who cares lol but thanks for the gratz.

[Piers]

mm vs foe full out in wilderness each cc/friendschat/irc/ts has a special judge/adjudicator in cc/friendschats/irc/ts

[Derrick]

mm vs foe full out in wilderness each cc/friendschat/irc/ts has a special judge/adjudicator in cc/friendschats/irc/ts

Pierz goes hard lol

[Manaana]

Not enough trust between clans for anything to go ahead in the wilderness. Clan wars dangerous default, can be negotiated to wilderness if both clans think its worth while.

[Dax]

i nominate p0ke to run the list

[Scotts Law]

this won't work, just look at the people fighting over the rules already. But can't blame you for trying to get wars going.. but certain clans are too scared to war.. :s

 

Didn't your clan just decline a P2P fullout with FOE because "100v100 isn't fullout"?

 

For a clan that brags about their 3 100v100 "fullout" wins last year nonstop, seems like FOE aren't the ones full of excuses anymore.

what? where are you going with this lol? If clans can pull over 100 and if it's capped at 100.. it's not a full out. Our past wars with FOE, neither clan was pulling much over 100 so the cap wasn't that big of a deal. It's different now.

 

pretty sure each clan had to sit a few, so it wasnt a fullout

 

but gratz on ur 3 matched prep wins last year.

 

Yes because there was any other way of warring last year. Especially when no one wanted to war in the PVP zone because of crashers. Besides, I think I'm right in saying MM only pulled 103 for the war. Sorry to those 3 who had to sit.

 

Sit down, shut up.

[Brian-For3ver]

10 or 1 Defence.

Leaders should be able to vary the rules too if they so choose to.

[Azrael]

this won't work, just look at the people fighting over the rules already. But can't blame you for trying to get wars going.. but certain clans are too scared to war.. :s

 

Didn't your clan just decline a P2P fullout with FOE because "100v100 isn't fullout"?

 

For a clan that brags about their 3 100v100 "fullout" wins last year nonstop, seems like FOE aren't the ones full of excuses anymore.

what? where are you going with this lol? If clans can pull over 100 and if it's capped at 100.. it's not a full out. Our past wars with FOE, neither clan was pulling much over 100 so the cap wasn't that big of a deal. It's different now.

 

pretty sure each clan had to sit a few, so it wasnt a fullout

 

but gratz on ur 3 matched prep wins last year.

 

Yes because there was any other way of warring last year. Especially when no one wanted to war in the PVP zone because of crashers. Besides, I think I'm right in saying MM only pulled 103 for the war. Sorry to those 3 who had to sit.

 

Sit down, shut up.

A full out war involving any of the top 3 clans would get crashed. Also, your clan seems to have a bit of history with a clan that tends to crash pure wars involving you. Not naming any names, of course. :Slim:

[Veta]

I agree with everything besides the 20 def. In my opinion it should be 1 def, great topic poke.

in the old PCR list, the rules were negotiated, including defence. 10 defence was when no one could agree.

I understand that but 1 def is the only fair.

[Tonka Forever]

this won't work, just look at the people fighting over the rules already. But can't blame you for trying to get wars going.. but certain clans are too scared to war.. :s

 

Didn't your clan just decline a P2P fullout with FOE because "100v100 isn't fullout"?

 

For a clan that brags about their 3 100v100 "fullout" wins last year nonstop, seems like FOE aren't the ones full of excuses anymore.

what? where are you going with this lol? If clans can pull over 100 and if it's capped at 100.. it's not a full out. Our past wars with FOE, neither clan was pulling much over 100 so the cap wasn't that big of a deal. It's different now.

 

pretty sure each clan had to sit a few, so it wasnt a fullout

 

but gratz on ur 3 matched prep wins last year.

 

Yes because there was any other way of warring last year. Especially when no one wanted to war in the PVP zone because of crashers. Besides, I think I'm right in saying MM only pulled 103 for the war. Sorry to those 3 who had to sit.

 

Sit down, shut up.

 

There were 3 bh worlds and 3 pvp worlds, and any clan could crash just as easily now as then because everyone has spies in everyone.

 

If you sat anyone its not a fullout, and FOE would have had to sit people too.

 

And i'm already sitting down, you think i hero on pure warfare standing up?

 

Think before you hit that 'add reply' button please.