RAW LIST (Poll Vote)

[Volt]

Everybody on this topic, cool it. It's almost hilarious how these defense debates can get.

 

I'm personally an advocate of allowing clans to negotiate defense requirements, and defaulting it to 10 if neither clan can agree.

 

And if you really think that not being allowed to have your mithril is limiting you, then your clan probably isn't good enough to win in the first place.

[Prateek]

Yes with 20 def cap. Leaders should be able to have the flexibility to decide amongst themselves the def cap, with 20 the highest.

[Known 2 Pown]

1 def cap TBH.

[Hey-Ireland]

Sure, I'd be down for 1 defence all categories but I'm afraid not enough clans will sign up and will fail miserably.

 

To the idiots saying EoP won't do 1 defence, I just proved you wrong. We've beaten both MM/FOE 1 defence before and we can do it again despite our memberlist being lower than theirs.

 

The lilguy clans need to step up and challenge the top 3 as EOP/MM/FOE have been here forever.

 

PS: If your clan slumps losing in a fullout, you are bad, very bad. Man up.

I respect you and your clan alot more for saying this, now just make it happen.

In p2p i would say defence cap is negotiable as well as the rules because if eop were fighting foe they could put curses on but if they fought mm that wouldn't be fair. F2p must be 1 defence because armour makes a bigger difference though

[Tom]

Very much doubt MM will join but it promotes wars so i voted yes with 1 def cap

[Omni]

Your wish is my command, except it's going to be different.