What's your opinion on winning through a crash and options.

[Omni]

Well I want to know how you can claim a win when a clan crashes.

 

For example:

 

<[NME]Ivp> (09:49:01) <Omni> Going to post a rule about assuming other clans options is technically a bait, and assuming you won even though you got crashed

(09:49:38) <Omni> "OMG WE GOT CRASHED BY FI, BUT ITS OK we HAD 50 ENDING and CP HAS 12 EVEN THO IT WAS MID CRASH, EITHER WAY WE WON CUS WE THINK WE HAD MORE"

 

When you get crashed, how do you know how many the other clan has? Just wondering how you can pause the map and see because I'd like to learn this magic trick for my friends, because I know wars are larger than the mini-map.

 

Also, how do you feel about clans posting starting Ops and ending Ops, when they have no clue about it themselves, and should a rule be implimented so that you can only post what you started the trip with and explain what you did, without assuming what the other clans had or assuming you won?

 

Thanks,

Omni

[`Pure]

When you get crashed, how do you know how many the other clan has?

 

They're wizards.

 

Or they don't actually know...

[Inu]

Just say how many your clan had

[Alpha]

Just post a vid instead of claiming obscure statistics. Place an age limit on people making topics for clans, or at least limit it to people who are capable of reason and logic, which is most often absent.

[Azrael]

Just post a vid instead of claiming obscure statistics. Place an age limit on people making topics for clans, or at least limit it to people who are capable of reason and logic, which is often absent.

Capable of reason and logic? There wouldn't be any posts.

[Gotcho]

simple picture of opponents ending should suffice

[Big Alex 67]

Clans should just mention that someone crashed, and leave it there.

[Alpha]

Just post a vid instead of claiming obscure statistics. Place an age limit on people making topics for clans, or at least limit it to people who are capable of reason and logic, which is often absent.

Capable of reason and logic? There wouldn't be any posts.

 

Touche lol. Well in that case if we are to allow such miscreants continue to post such ignorance, I request to be allowed to troll them in full.

[Azrael]

Just post a vid instead of claiming obscure statistics. Place an age limit on people making topics for clans, or at least limit it to people who are capable of reason and logic, which is often absent.

Capable of reason and logic? There wouldn't be any posts.

 

Touche lol. Well in that case if we are to allow such miscreants continue to post such ignorance, I request to be allowed to troll them in full.

I will allow it.

[Turisma]

pictures of opts- at the very least the end lol

[Ben√]

I like the idea about not posting specifics options/numbers in wildy fights- I think I saw a topic by Malice that did this yesturday.

[Altus]

Clans should just mention that someone crashed, and leave it there.

[♥ Sandra ♥]

You need to 'L2HowToFindEnemyOpts'

 

In all seriousness. Just ask the other clan leader for the opts. And you should only mention the crash, claiming a win or saying 'we did better' shouldn't be allowed. People will judge by looking at the video's.

[Hugh]

Clans often put #+ as a guesstimate, but its plucked out of thin air and is an obviously biased opinion.

 

A rule should be implemented that if a crash does take place, the clan states there ending opts but leaves the apposing clans n/a. But leave them free to comment on how they thought the fight was going, after all they should be allowed to post whether or not they think they were winning or not.

 

Should make for an overall fairer and more accurate topic.

[Sniping]

You need to 'L2HowToFindEnemyOpts'

 

In all seriousness. Just ask the other clan leader for the opts. And you should only mention the crash, claiming a win or saying 'we did better' shouldn't be allowed. People will judge by looking at the video's.

Implying the Leader you're asking will give you correct opts and not inflate it.

[Aly]

Simply cant claim a win, the clans themselves know what went down. All the rest is just for propaganda :thumbsup:

[Mafia]

Let's create a rank whose job it would be to guess all the opts? I'd be up to the task :3

[Derp]

A magician never reveals their secrets?

[Brayden]

I kinda like Malice's topics. They never have starting and ending opts. They just say who the fought, what they peaked out, and how the fights happen. I think thats how topics should be made.

[Scotts Law]

It's not possible. The fight looks different from each individuals perspective. The fact is that no-one knows who was about to win.

[Yawnz]

I kinda like Malice's topics. They never have starting and ending opts. They just say who the fought, what they peaked out, and how the fights happen. I think thats how topics should be made.

[ydoC]

If on video or a good enough picture, people should be allowed to claim a win.

[Omni]

If on video or a good enough picture, people should be allowed to claim a win.

I can edit a video to show only the "best" parts of the fight, and claim a fall in at the end.

[bullet]

I kinda like Malice's topics. They never have starting and ending opts. They just say who the fought, what they peaked out, and how the fights happen. I think thats how topics should be made.

[ydoC]

If on video or a good enough picture, people should be allowed to claim a win.

I can edit a video to show only the "best" parts of the fight, and claim a fall in at the end.

I was referring to a good enough video showing you CLEARLY winning a fight before its crashed.

 

 

aka; almost never, meaning the only time you can claim a win on a crashed fight is when you were actually winning

 

 

As far as starting/ending, maybe require opt pictures in order to mention your opts. Then again, you still wouldn't know the enemy clans opts, so.. I guess you could just not allow opts to be mentioned.