Top Clan List!

[Brian]

 

Okay, Like Pure Community's Pure clan Top List. We should make it like this

 

There will be a code to fill out such as this one below, (You don't have to use it)

 

 

F2P:

 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 

P2P

 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 

Overall

 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

 

 

The reason for this is to spread the popularity and publicty of not just the higher clans that are always mentioned, but to the Med and lower clans aswell. I know we all want a say and things so why not make a code like the one above and make it a rule so that members wont just keep putting down the same clans over and over again, its not hard to copy and paste a list and just fill in the clans according to their requirements. If they dont know how many clans there are in a division, then simply leave the number blank.

 

Please discuss if you think this is a good idea. Remeber, the whole reason behind this is so more clans can get publicity like the lower ones and also so members of this community can know what clans are ranked where.

 

Rules

 

1. You must have a list within your post or it will be deleted!

2. No flame baits, flaming, trolling, double posts etc.

3. You must stay on topic, if you have a problem with someone, Report them.

[`Bullet`]

High Level Clans (80+ Stat)

 

1.mm/foe. mm #1 f2p #2 p2p foe #2 f2p #1 p2p

2.

3.fi- #3 in both

4.tlp top 7 in f2p and top 3 in p2p

5.e top 4 f2p needs more p2p

 

Med Level Clans (70+ Stat)

 

1.dv needs numbers and org.

2.eop coming outta slump

3.cp slump.

4.m pro clan

5.a here i guess

 

Low/med level Clans (30-65+ Stat)

 

1.cr clearly #1

2.mg has numbers

3.ic coming outta slump. great org.

4.cr doing good

5.vd bad org.

[Inu]

High Level Clans (80+ Stat)

 

1. MM Clearly the best

2. Foe Lost to MM, capable of bouncing back

3. Fi Active, good f2p and p2p, just lacks numbers

4. TLP Pimp

5. DV Best overall

 

Med Level Clans (60+ Stat)

 

1. IR: Good p2p, ok F2p, Should be 80+ imo

2. Vo: Very well organized f2p clan

3. DY: Very active, good mini unit

4. SD: Chain is a beast. Gotta recover from ranks leaving

5. CR: Hold this place for now. MG, CV, and FF are charging hard

 

Low level Clans (30+ Stat)

 

1. Pd Gud massers

2. IC You should raise reqs

3. LR: Not much that I know

4. Lc Not much that I know

5.

[Pur3_Kide]

Last Saturday: Based on what I heard/Seen from last Saturday.

 

 

1. MM - Beat FOE and Fi

2. FOE - Pulled ~15 More then Fi and would probably won a fair 1 vs 1

3. Fi - Low Pull

4. E - Beat the below, even tho the fight with Dv stopped half-way I'll let you claim the victory

5. Dv - Beat EOP+Dy

6. EOP+Dy - Pulled more then TLP and would probably won a fair 1 vs 1

7. TLP - Had the same numbers as IR, would won against IR with easy

8. IR

9. A / Cp

10. Dp / Cy - DP pulled 25, main reason was no leader were on. Only 1 HC were on to lead.

[D E D]

I'll say the first top 5

 

F2P

1-MM

2-FOE

3-FI

4-E

4-DV

[`Paladn]

I'll say the first top 5

 

F2P

1-MM

2-FOE

3-FI

4-E

4-DV

 

Good list, exactly what I would put. But since its overall not sure about DV and E, E's not that great in p2p from what I heard, and I know DV is decent f2p and p2p.

[D E D]

Good list, exactly what I would put. But since its overall not sure about DV and E, E's not that great in p2p from what I heard, and I know DV is decent f2p and p2p.

 

thats f2p list :)

[♥ Sandra ♥]

High Level Clans (80+ Stat)

 

1. Foe - A good organised clan. Although MM are better then them at F2P.

2. MM - Good warring clan but nothing more.

3. Fi - Good F2P clan but can't really compete with above atm.

4. E - Good F2P clan, not good at P2P and can't compete with above.

5. Dv - #4 overal clan if you ask me. Good at F2P and P2P.

 

Med Level Clans (60+ Stat)

 

1. Destructive Pures - I know they have 80+ reqs but aren't good enough to compete even opt.

2. Calamity - Allright clan

3. Malice - Just ownage :D

4. Veneratio - Good at clanwars

 

Low level Clans (30+ Stat)

 

1. Chivalry - Decent

2. Inception - Stable clan

3. Violent Demise - Weird but funny clan :D

[`Bullet`]

High Level Clans (80+ Stat)

 

1. Foe - A good organised clan. Although MM are better then them at F2P.

2. MM - Good warring clan but nothing more.

3. Fi - Good F2P clan but can't really compete with above atm.

4. E - Good F2P clan, not good at P2P and can't compete with above.

5. Dv - #4 overal clan if you ask me. Good at F2P and P2P.

 

Med Level Clans (60+ Stat)

 

1. Destructive Pures - I know they have 80+ reqs but aren't good enough to compete even opt.

2. Calamity - Allright clan

3. Malice - Just ownage :D

4. Veneratio - Good at clanwars

 

Low level Clans (30+ Stat)

 

1. Chivalry - Decent

2. Inception - Stable clan

3. Violent Demise - Weird but funny clan :D

clearly EpicDemic is the #1 low klen

[Toby]

Looks like a fair topic to me.

[Scott]

Just let people post whatever lists they want, shouldn't constrict them to certain lists.

[Kangaroo]

ROOT, almost every member of the pure community lists only the higher clans and never the med or lower, this is for publicity purposes only for the lower and lower med lvl clans. Everyone else seems to agree with it and are already started listing. I will talk with the admins about the whole Ladder system.

 

You seem to have missed my point entirely. It's not that the list the "higher clans" over the lower ones, because let's face it. the higher clans are the ones which have been there long enough to get to the point where they begin to tighten up the requirements, as opposed to the lower leveled clans which dont' always succeed and are often seen as simply "a group of massers." Nor do I have anything wrong with clans gaining publicity, I see nothing wrong with clans posting topics to show the members of the community how they went on the weekend - Who they fought, what the out comes of those fights were, etc. - No, my main 'disagreement' lies with the basis of the topic itself. I simply don't see the need to judge clans by their weekly performance. It's not hard for any clan to have a good pull one week and then a bad one the next. All it does it make people's opinions of that clan fluctuate. (which, I guess in some ways can be good as it riddles out the inconsistent and allows the consistent clans to establish a 'secure' rank, as seen by the public).

 

For example, and this is in no way desired to be offensive;

Last Saturday: Based on what I heard/Seen from last Saturday.

 

 

1. MM - Beat FOE and Fi

2. FOE - Pulled ~15 More then Fi and would probably won a fair 1 vs 1

3. Fi - Low Pull

4. E - Beat the below, even tho the fight with Dv stopped half-way I'll let you claim the victory

5. Dv - Beat EOP+Dy

6. EOP+Dy - Pulled more then TLP and would probably won a fair 1 vs 1

7. TLP - Had the same numbers as IR, would won against IR with easy

8. IR

9. A / Cp

10. Dp / Cy - DP pulled 25, main reason was no leader were on. Only 1 HC were on to lead.

 

as I've stated; I don't see the purpose of judging weekly performances as the clans 'rank.' Nor do I see much point in there being systems like the "PCR" system where clans are ranked on the outcome of one war. The reality of it all, and we must all try to remember this, is that there is no single system which is accurate enough to show the true rankings of a clan. At any point in time, their activity may drop, or they may get an influx of members. It's simply too unpredictable.

 

as for the restrictions placed on what lists people are allowed to post, I agree with Scott. there isn't going to be accurate lists based on requirements. There's too many clans with the same requirements to name the top 5 of each.

Just let people post whatever lists they want, shouldn't constrict them to certain lists.

 

==========================================================================

This will be left as a discussion topic, but not a pinned topic.

With a topic like this, from experience, I doubt it would need to be pinned anyway. It's simply my opinion about the topic; in no way do I expect it to be closed - heck, it's healthy for forum activity (yeah, i'm probably a hypocrite). But simply, thank you and I hope people bare in mind that one days performance doesn't mean how well a clan is doing.

[0wnage]

Not going to use the code seen as i dont no that many reqs of clans etc

 

Last saturday

 

1. MM - beat Foe?

2. Foe - would have beaten below

3. Fi

4. E - Dv finished A, you got caught on logg in you were winning imo

5. Dv - low pull fortunate that all clans had low pulls too, beat below

6. Eop + Dy

7. Cp?

8. Rest

[bullet]

High Level Clans (80+ Stat)

 

1. MM- Have been beating Foe and Fi every week it seems like

2. Foe- i think will end up taking #1 back in the near future.

3. Fi- i think they will lose this spot soon.

4. TLP- Good in P2P,but if they dont step it up e will take it from them.

5. E- Verygood f2p clan and dont see them losing this spot anytime soon,but i think will rise soon tho.

 

Med Level Clans (60+ Stat)

 

1. CY- idk if they are med level clan,but they are a good stable clan.

2. IR- just beat eg in the full out and is growing everyday.

3. Vo- A good clan wars clan,but i would like to see more bh trips and more people at the bh trips

4. Dy- have not heard alot from ya'll

5. Cr- A really good clan that i see a good future for.

 

Low level Clans (30+ Stat)

 

1. Cv- Again idk if you are low or med,but a great clan.

2. Ic- coming out of slump will hope to see big things from ya'll

3. Lr- Dont know alot about ya'll but i know that you have great leadership.

[`Pure]

Malice and Mid Generation transcend requirements. They are true champions.

[Speshls]

1. MM

2. FOE

3. FI

 

GAP

 

4. Epidemic

5. DV

6. TLP

[streetz]

1. MM

2. FOE

3. FI

 

GAP

 

4. Epidemic

5. DV

6. TLP

Josh, wrong again.

 

1. MM

2. Fi

3. FOE

 

GAP

 

4. Epidemic

5. TLP

6. Dv

 

there you go, my young apprentice.

[Pal]

Low/med level Clans (30-65+ Stat)

 

1.cr clearly #1

2.mg has numbers

3.ic coming outta slump. great org.

4.cr doing good

5.vd bad org.

 

LMFAO was this posted before or after we killed you 2 minutes into your trip

 

 

MM

FOE

Fi

E

TLP

Dv

EoP

CP

A

 

Rest changes too much for me to have a good enough idea to comment on

[P0ke N Die]

I think it should be...

 

 

High Level Clans (85+ Stat)

 

 

Med Level Clans (70+ Stat)

 

 

Low Level Clans (Under 70+ Stat)

 

 

 

 

Clans with 60+ requirements aren't med level..

[Ded]

MM

FOE

FI

E

DV/TLP/DP

[blue]

idk atm ...

[Birdy]

i think this is better than the regular list

ty for your valuable input?

[P0ke N Die]

Well anyway, here is my full list..

 

1. MM

2. FOE

3. FI

 

4. E

5. DV

6. TLP

 

7. DP

8. CY/EOP/A

9. ---

10. ---

[13th]

is it going by average stats/combat levels or requirements?

[steve]

High Level Clans (80+ Stat)

 

1. MM

2. FI

3. FOE

4. E or EOP

5. Dv

 

Med Level Clans (60+ Stat)

 

1. DP

2. calamity

3.

4.

5.

 

Low level Clans (30+ Stat)

 

1. (Clan) [What do you think about the clan?]

2.

3.

4.

5.