60 Vs 75 Vs 80 Attack

[Devin]

I hate being 89 combat and trying to pk, everyone in edge is either a rune pure, sometimes with turm, or a 70+ def range tank. Bridding is ok but even if you try to brid at wests you get attacked by turm zerks and pures which sucks. I recently got pking stats on my 50 attack pure and its quite fun, I'll probably get 60 attack soon on it and won't go any higher.

[Seany]

60 or 80 depending on which type of pking you perfer :)

 

For clanning purposes 80 is obviously better.

[Apache]

CLAN> PKING

[Pures4lyf1]

60 att gets boring after awhile, i'd get 80.

[Mass]

The higher your attack, the more mains you'll come across.

Imo stay 60, more fun.

[Alcohol]

Depends, 80 attack obv only if u got chaotics, 75 attack if you wanna ags prod, 60 attack if you wanna vs pures instead of mains.

[StankyTurtle]

i agree with the others 60 att if you pk a lot or 80 att to get chaotics and help your clan with a few more cb lvls

[Trapping]

i agree with the others 60 att if you pk a lot or 80 att to get chaotics and help your clan with a few more cb lvls

[iGwased]

I like my 60 attack account much more then my old 80 attack account.

 

A lot lower combat

Actually fight pures

[TGoD Chad]

If you like bridding at drags, stay 60 attack

 

If you like miniwars/1 banging idiots in edgeville/clan preps/bridding with high risk, get 80 attack

 

but on that note, I suggest staying under 82 cmb if you're going to brid at drags, you wanna actually brid pures who have a chance to win because of their skill, not because of their mage and defence bonuses.

[Crazzot]

Strictly clanning - the higher the attack the better.

[runeboy69]

75 for dat sol

[Doozy]

60 attack with chaotic staff/cbow

[light mayhem]

75