Jump to content

Welcome to Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures

Welcome to Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.

Why dont clans just evolve into pure / rune pure


walli

Recommended Posts

Stupid seeing people at defence levels of 35-39. When 40 defence adds one combat level and provides a lot of bonus it makes no sense why clans just dont get on with it and change into pure /rune pure and cater for both categories.

 

 

Maybe just me but should just allow 1cmb more and benefit from all the bonus in wildy and if you care thta much stick to the same old restrictions in clanwars which keep every1 'happy' and feeling they are fighitng on a level playing field.

 

1 combat more

1 combat more

1 combat more

1 combat more

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????

 

120904153336.png

 

120904153339.png

 

120904153342.png

 

 

 

 

Here's one just for you walli.

 

 

120904154427.png

 

120904154432.png

 

 

 

 

what

 

Dude ur full of **** 1st pic 0f wallis was 99 pray and on the 2nd one u changes it to 95 pray ******.

 

**** just got real

siguoi.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Stupid seeing people at defence levels of 35-39. When 40 defence adds one combat level and provides a lot of bonus it makes no sense why clans just dont get on with it and change into pure /rune pure and cater for both categories.

 

 

Maybe just me but should just allow 1cmb more and benefit from all the bonus in wildy and if you care thta much stick to the same old restrictions in clanwars which keep every1 'happy' and feeling they are fighitng on a level playing field.

 

1 combat more

1 combat more

1 combat more

1 combat more

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????

 

120904153336.png

 

120904153339.png

 

120904153342.png

 

 

 

 

Here's one just for you walli.

 

 

120904154427.png

 

120904154432.png

 

 

 

 

what

 

Dude ur full of **** 1st pic 0f wallis was 99 pray and on the 2nd one u changes it to 95 pray ******.

 

lmfao legend

tbGUZ.png

 

iTmiT.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stupid seeing people at defence levels of 35-39. When 40 defence adds one combat level and provides a lot of bonus it makes no sense why clans just dont get on with it and change into pure /rune pure and cater for both categories.

 

 

Maybe just me but should just allow 1cmb more and benefit from all the bonus in wildy and if you care thta much stick to the same old restrictions in clanwars which keep every1 'happy' and feeling they are fighitng on a level playing field.

 

1 combat more

1 combat more

1 combat more

1 combat more

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????

 

120904153336.png

 

120904153339.png

 

120904153342.png

 

 

 

 

Here's one just for you walli.

 

 

120904154427.png

 

120904154432.png

 

 

 

 

what

 

Dude ur full of **** 1st pic 0f wallis was 99 pray and on the 2nd one u changes it to 95 pray ******.

You missed the point completely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This entire debate comes down to semantics and how players define 'pure'. Let it be said that it's a broad term that is not set in stone. It's definition changes on a clan to clan basis. It's not a ridiculous idea to draw the line at 45, it's a line the same way all others are, just more inclusive. That inclusiveness is clearly a factor one should take into consideration when disallowing players who ever so slightly sway from arbitrary requirements.

 

My opinion, which has been for a long time now, is as the OP's. I feel players get too caught up in whimsically decided semantics and dichotomies that arise from said meanings. Perhaps there shouldn't be a black and white mentality here but a spectral one. Toss out the vague and argued upon term 'pure' and merely realize accounts can be defined universally more easily by simply saying what they are; an account with 1 defense is an account with 1 defense, the same way an account with 45 is an account with 45. Instead of trying to make it seem we're comparing apples and oranges, let's call us all apples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
  • Create New...