what takes more skill

[Resist]

what is your personal opinion on p2p/f2p warring, i know almost everybody is going to be biased (based on what clan they're in and etc) but try to explain why you think the other 1 is better. I personally think both sides have their advantages, a downside also.

[RETRO]

P2P is more about what statistics a clan has; what gear they can afford, what spells/weapons they can use. Because P2P is a broader playing field in comparison to the conventional Rune Scimitar and Maple shortbow, I'd say P2P fights involve more individual skill, and more know-how.

[Ricky]

P2P takes more skill. Requires quick movement and combo food and other things like necklaces. F2P is usually run click. Not much of a strategist role.

[LGeeZY]

p2pz

[Guest Bvb aka A i r 1s]

both.

[Lucky Hit3r]

F2p is all about clan overall skill, p2p is individual skill. Don't know anything else to say, most of it has been argued already.

 

Oh well, discuss.

[Ray]

p2p = more individual skill

f2p = more organization

[Resist]

ok

[Darius]

F2P = Skill as a clan

P2P = Individual skill

[LGeeZY]

lol

[Ray]

F2P = Skill as a clan

P2P = Individual skill

 

I disagree, p2p offers individual skill while f2p is more clan based

[Gack]

I disagree, p2p offers individual skill while f2p is more clan based

 

Me too.

[I Pa I]

P2p of course, it show clan strength and show your members ability to spread, but at the same time stay close enough to each other to help.

 

Also in P2p you can just go in there with mult spell and just auto attack,but in pvp you have to actually mix is up with single spells, mult spells, and ko weapons.

[Darius]

I disagree, p2p offers individual skill while f2p is more clan based

 

Isnt that what i said o.O

[Gack]

Isnt that what i said o.O

 

I agree.

[Ray]

I agree.

 

I don't, I think that's what he said

[Mark]

This topic has been created several times lol

[Tom]

Neither are particularly hard, click and spam in F2P, auto cast and spam in P2P then swap to dds/put on a necklace and eat some food.

[Kangaroo]

I would say p2p would be 'harder' to learn how to do simply due to the broader range. Magic is more important; Ice and miasmic spells play a major part in any fight in p2p whereas there's really only "bind" in f2p.

There's harder hitting range equipment (crossbows, karil's bow) not just a shortbow on rapid and all the melee weapons hit a lot harder - one could argue some are overpowered in comparison.

Then there's the rings, necklaces, potions and different food combinations in p2p. f2p is simply strength potion, lobster/swordfish and maybe even some pizza.

[Bob]

what kind of question is this >.<

 

Obviously P2P takes more "Skill".

 

And it's more timing than skills but call it what you want.

[13th]

i think f2p... to my experience winning a battle in p2p is mostly based on timing and location

 

though if the tables are set fairly for p2p i think it comes down more to individual skill rather than working as a team

[Z_Jr]

i think f2p... to my experience winning a battle in p2p is mostly based on timing and location

 

though if the tables are set fairly for p2p i think it comes down more to individual skill rather than working as a team

What the swede said.

[Reilly]

neither all you do is click a mouse fast

[Scott]

I'd say clan-wise, F2P. Piling and spamming needs to happen in f2p in order for a clan to win, whereas in p2p one person could kill a few people on his own if the specials are good.

[Cooney]

P2P is more difficult imo, because of all the different outfits/use of stats/...