50 Attack or 60?

[Reilly]

K well the new pure that I'm starting has the opportunity to be 50, or 60 attack.It will have all pure quests finished, and I still have the ability to keep 50 attack if I choose to do so.

 

 

Now my question is, what do the majority of the pure world think. If you're going to post give the pros and cons of both.

 

 

*I WILL NOT BE BUYING D'CLAWS*

 

Some facts about the account;

 

- It will be a hybrid, but while 1v1'ing (In Edge, which is where I do the majority of my Pking) I'll be using Range/Melee

- As mentioned before, I will not be buying D'claws if I get 60 attack.

 

 

These are the stats I'd plan to get depending if I do/don't get 60 attack:

 

60 Attack

75 Strength

85 Range

44 Prayer

 

50 Attack

80 Strength

85 Range

44 Prayer

 

These are just short term goals, eventually I plan on getting 60 attack, but should I keep 50 until I advance further?

[`Paladn]

60s more fun and effective, 50 fails and puts me to sleep.

[Zany]

50 is kinda better but 60 is funner

[Toby]

I'd get 60.

[Resist]

50 is overated, gmaul sucks **** almost half the time and specs arent even great. dds u get 4 chances but u can p neck out most of em unless u catch em at a good time.

[ii inabit ii]

50 att

[Ice]

60, i would keep 50 attack until 80 strength then get 60 though, although alot of people say about 50 attack being amazing alot of the people that do dont actually keep it, i love mauling and think its much better at like -65 combat but after that personally 60 is much more versatile+ you can go on non +1 worlds without risking 350k just for the maul which does help if your not wealthy

[tlal]

60

[Cpt Jack]

I'd go with 60 attack. The dragon dagger special has 8 hits with its special, whereas the granite maul only has 3, meaning you dish out more damage in the long run. If you can time the special perfectly, you can stack the dragon dagger hits with your primary weapon making it just as deadly as a granite maul.

[Pooninranger]

60, DDS is better than G maul coz of specs and its 3 hits, and done. Whereas DDS is 2 hits x 4 making 8 hits in a spec, making it much more effective, ofcourse it also depends on your strength level and opponent though, and I think DDS would suit you.

[`JvYv]

60 More Choice of combos / G mauls 2 spec dds 4.

[Elmo]

50 attack if used well can be heaps better than 60. But its hard to time alot of the hits and everything. 60 attack in my opinion requires less skill, but its good for hybrid pking.

[Jake]

60 attack is better once your over 70+ combat. Under I'de say 50 attack .

[CONVlCT]

I was 50, got 60...regretted every moment of it... and went and made another 50 attack pure.

[Reilly]

I was 50, got 60...regretted every moment of it... and went and made another 50 attack pure.

thxyo

[RETRO]

I've heard 50 is better and know it has lesser effect on your combat which has to be taken into consideration as a pure.

[Cuality]

50 Atk no doubt.

[Kaleb]

50 sucks in F2P and P2P. If you have over 60 combat, get 60; it's more useful and much more effective.

[theo]

depends.

50 gives less options but u can hit higher .

60 there are so many options and you can just melee if you want to.

its all up to what u feel about maul or dds/ wateva d spec wep

[James Barrag3d]

60 attack is great if your 80+ strength imo.

[`Pure]

50 is a lot better in my opinion. I was 50-90-1 with 31 pray, 90 range, and 94 mage. Was the most fun I had pking with a pure. Anybody that says g maul sucks is an idiot. And if you have enough cash to combine maul with vls or stat hammer you'll really wreck kids (which was one of the things I did).

[LGeeZY]

take if from a pro 50 attack ( refer to sig ) - keep 50 - 60 is trash

[Goop]

If i could take away my attack levels, I would get 50 no doubt.

 

G maulin is pro.

[-Charlie-]

60 atk.

[Ray]

50 atk vs 60 atk was debatable before corrupt came out. Now as long as you can afford corrupt, 60 atk > 50 atk