-=~=- Ideal Pure Clan List -=~=-

[Bad Kangaroo]

lol epidemic #3 overall

?

[IPCL Manager]

How do you know who gets a legit win? Some clans retreat etc, stop returning. Some of the fights are confusing to see who won the fight overall?

 

I'm a mastermind.

 

(I'm actually not sharing how I am going to do these exact calculations, you can attempt to find out as the weekend goes on and I update the list)

[Mateo]

Can we reach negative points?

[Scott]

You'll see in about three days if you can or not.

[IPCL Manager]

Can we reach negative points?

 

Hahahah. Good question, I'm going to say yes for now.

[Speshls]

Not really liking the idea of this lol.

[Drunk]

Not really liking the idea of this lol.

Lol *****. Jk <3

[Meklomaniac]

you cant control how we pk you arrogant piece of ****, suck my ****.

[IPCL Manager]

Not really liking the idea of this lol.

 

I honestly expected that, maybe after a couple weeks people start seeing it is actually accurate. :)

[Derrick]

you cant control how we pk you arrogant piece of ****, suck my ****.

 

LOL

[Mateo]

Hahahah. Good question, I'm going to say yes for now.

Epidemic, how low can you go? Can you down low? All the way to...

 

 

 

F me.

[IPCL Manager]

you cant control how we pk you arrogant piece of ****, suck my ****.

Reread the post, this isn't controlling diddly doo. You pk, you make a topic, I update my list, simple.

[Final]

llelelellee

[Scott]

Mek, you are my hero.

[Bloody 2h]

you cant control how we pk you arrogant piece of ****, suck my ****.

 

I actally agree with thisl. Clans that actually care about this will feel they are forced to pk a certain way to get points.

[Scott]

Shut the **** up bloody you just spoiled the awesomeness of his post.

[Speshls]

So Malice kills more clans than MM they get more points and are ranked #1?

 

And it seems like you are kind of trying to control clans actions if they do care about ranks.

[IPCL Manager]

I actally agree with thisl. Clans that actually care about this will feel they are forced to pk a certain way to get points.

 

No one should care about this :D. It's a simple success/activity leader board.

[13th]

A nice thought but it will never work because of the complexity of real PKRI's

 

It is never simple clan A vs clan B, and where is the line drawn between a crash and not a crash? Killing a clan after they just beat someone? killing a clan while they were fighting someone, killing a clan before they were supposed to have a fight with someone?

 

There are as many definitions as there are people on this community and even if YOU were given the right to say what is and what is not it would still subtract credibility from the list and make it un-interesting.

 

Also this would just make some overall top list since the start of PW... i think a CURRENT top list is alot more attractive than one that stretches back to the creation of PW.

 

 

Once again a nice thought but no thanks.

[Bad Kangaroo]

you cant control how we pk you arrogant piece of ****, suck my ****.

LOL'D

[Tyler]

As far as I know this isn't being supported by Pure Warfare, but he is free to post it.

 

Don't feel as if it is our official list, because I'm not sure whether it is or not.

[Jake]

Nice, gl keeping this up :biggrin: .

[IPCL Manager]

So Malice kills more clans than MM they get more points and are ranked #1?

 

And it seems like you are kind of trying to control clans actions if they do care about ranks.

 

Wrong, it depends on who you fight, the formula is altered.

 

Responded already to the 2nd.

 

A nice thought but it will never work because of the complexity of real PKRI's

 

It is never simple clan A vs clan B, and where is the line drawn between a crash and not a crash? Killing a clan after they just beat someone? killing a clan while they were fighting someone, killing a clan before they were supposed to have a fight with someone?

 

There are as many definitions as there are people on this community and even if YOU were given the right to say what is and what is not it would still subtract credibility from the list and make it un-interesting.

 

Also this would just make some overall top list since the start of PW... i think a CURRENT top list is alot more attractive than one that stretches back to the creation of PW.

 

 

Once again a nice thought but no thanks.

 

You bring up good points but it is a easy process. The only crashing involved in this list is joining into a fight already going on. Lets say Clan A is banking after beating Clan B and Clan C rushes them walking to BH Bank, then wins. Clan C would get a partial victory and Clan A gets a partial loss. It's my own personal judgment on this case.

 

This is not even a community thing, it's an opinion supported by a few formulas I am following.

 

As time goes on and a clan begins to slump, they will not gain any points (or perhaps lose some) while other clans are staying stable or gaining them, there spot will be taken over. It has nothing with the time period this was created, it will all make itself accurate.

[Dave]

No thanks, won't work. It'll just be another biased list, can't be ****** with that. We already have PCR, don't need PCR v2.

[IPCL Manager]

No thanks, won't work. It'll just be another biased list, can't be ****** with that. We already have PCR, don't need PCR v2.

 

How is it biased? This is a formula/point system based list. You are a moron.