Pure as defined by jagex

[Lamotrigine]

**** you kids who hate on 45 def

 

[Dr Cake Town]

100 combat+ rune pures get **** on by tanks

85-100 rune pures are a success

40-85 pures typically have the stat advantage, thus making them a pure, so gl.

[V0idz]

100 combat+ rune pures get **** on by tanks

85-100 rune pures are a success

40-85 pures typically have the stat advantage, thus making them a pure, so gl.

no pure would beat any decent rune pure at any level unless they got a 30 30 spec, or have claws

[Karce]

no pure would beat any decent rune pure at any level unless they got a 30 30 spec, or have claws

 

Same goes with 100+ combat tanks. Depends on luck

[Zerker Jane]

What is this thing for?

 

 

Same goes with 100+ combat tanks. Depends on luck

 

As long as they aren't being complete defence nerds I win 7/10 times.

[Lamotrigine]

its for a tourny coming up of some sort.

[Jonah]

100 combat+ rune pures get **** on by tanks

85-100 rune pures are a success

40-85 pures typically have the stat advantage, thus making them a pure, so gl.

[Lamotrigine]

and yet 80% of pures I know lvls 70-80 ***** about how they cant hit on zerkers. Imo the only time pures truly do work is 80-85. When they're maxed 60 atk or have gs'.

[wcking179-]

u would be the retard to accept jagex definition of a pure (considering they ****** all pures over)

 

it also said that 45 or less is the definition of pure for THIS category, not necessarily the definition of pure itself

[Big Alex 67]

u would be the retard to accept jagex definition of a pure (considering they ****** all pures over)

 

it also said that 45 or less is the definition of pure for THIS category, not necessarily the definition of pure itself

i agree with thsi

[MarK.]

Jagex cup?

[Evan]

We are our own unique bread

 

Reppin it with pride

[Ryan-]

no pure would beat any decent rune pure at any level unless they got a 30 30 spec, or have claws

Im an 86 cb rune pure and most of my targs are nearly maxed ags pures, usually they just safe to full hp and hope for lucky specs then run

[O M G 0 Y K]

PW v. World?

[Bad Kangaroo]

It's the "Jagex clan cup 2010"... And note the "For this sub division", not generally speaking.

[Zany]

yeah i lol'd when i read that ******** rofl

[Swagga]

THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH EITHER OF WHAT YOU PUT, BUT I LOL'ED AT YOUR ALMOST MATCHING AVATARS...

 

I THINK FOE HAD THEIRS FIRST, SO FI...WHY THE COPY MATE?

loooooool

 

yeh the definition is obv a lie

[`Mo]

lol f2p 100+ and 80-100 wouldn't work out

[Dr Cake Town]

THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH EITHER OF WHAT YOU PUT, BUT I LOL'ED AT YOUR ALMOST MATCHING AVATARS...

 

I THINK FOE HAD THEIRS FIRST, SO FI...WHY THE COPY MATE?

It's quite different :bunny:

[0ynxx]

what i mconfused

[Gack]

blah

[Gack]

It's ok as long as pures(MM, FOE) pull 100 and rune pures(HF) like 70-80.

[Lamotrigine]

Im an 86 cb rune pure and most of my targs are nearly maxed ags pures, usually they just safe to full hp and hope for lucky specs then run

This. D4tchy tried fcing me cuz he couldnt win GMAULFTWK?. Keep trying pures, you'll get at me some day flamebaited :banana:

 

It's ok as long as pures(MM, FOE) pull 100 and rune pures(HF) like 70-80.

AND yet you guys still run from them?

[BarrageKyle]

:/

as long as pure clans have higher pulls, we are safe

[Jake]

How would clans like Hf and Vh count as pure clans then since they have loads of tankers with 70+ def?

 

Looks retarded to me, I'm going to stick to the good old wildy pkri's!