SERIOUS QUESTION, ONLY REPLY IF YOU'RE IN SERIOUSNESS MODE.

[+Karl]

With multiple personality disorders, I wonder if one personality has ever tried to sue another personality in court for something, for like eating their cheerios..

[`Pure]

:Slim:

[+Karl]

NO NOT ******* SLIM, I WANT A DISCUZZION.

[Omni]

[+Karl]

ur face

[Inu]

You do know they forget what they did if they have a personality disorder

[Ryan-]

:Slim:

[Omni]

 

 

?

[`Pure]

:squid:

[Dr Cake Town]

:sorcerer: :starwars: :derp: :lol: :banana: :whoops: :dotfire:

[Dr Cake Town]

But really, I highly doubt it, It would never make it to a judge and more often than not someone suffering from multiple disorders doesn't realize the other one exists, so no, I do not think this has ever or will ever happen.

[xVideos]

Even I'm not this retarted .. Maybe I'm so retarted I don't know what this is LOL!

[`Mo]

why cheerio's?

[Swagga]

why cheerio's?

was wondering the same thing.

[Matty]

Your kidding. The world has not yet caught Osama Bin Laden and your asking if cheerios will get to high court.

[Omni]

 

Let's say personality 1 kills your mother. Personality 2, is un-aware of how to deal with the situation and then consults personality 3. Together personality 2 and 3 call the cops and get personality 1 arrested. In court personality 1, 2 and 3 are present. On the witness stand, personality 2 claims that personality 1 killed their mother. Personality 3 believes in this truth and is also on the witness stand afterwards. Who is the who in this who-problem and are they all to be tried in court for personality 1's crime?

[Casey]

This could definitely be something to think about

[Brayden]

Your kidding. The world has not yet caught Osama Bin Laden and your asking if cheerios will get to high court.

LMAOOOOOO

[Rain]

Even I'm not this retarted .. Maybe I'm so retarted I don't know what this is LOL!

 

(14:55:34) -Vectra[06]- ** (URBAN): ["retarted"]: One who has been given additional tarts.

(14:55:35) -Vectra[06]- ** (URBAN): [Example]: Tartmobile vendor: Here is your extra tart sir. Consider yourself retarted.Tartmobile customer: Yes thank you I am certainly retarted and happy!

 

So let's see what you just said.

 

Even I'm not this (One who has been given additional tarts) Maybe I'm so (One who has been given additional tarts) I don't know what this is LOL!

 

Retard*

[Pink]

 

:unsure: :unsure: :unsure: :unsure:

[Anthoni]

:tito:

 

 

:NULL:

 

:dotfire:

 

:squid:

[Bob]

 

Let's say personality 1 kills your mother. Personality 2, is un-aware of how to deal with the situation and then consults personality 3. Together personality 2 and 3 call the cops and get personality 1 arrested. In court personality 1, 2 and 3 are present. On the witness stand, personality 2 claims that personality 1 killed their mother. Personality 3 believes in this truth and is also on the witness stand afterwards. Who is the who in this who-problem and are they all to be tried in court for personality 1's crime?

 

The answer is 154.

[Jonah]

 

 

ur face

[Zell]

my naem is carl

[Im Andi]

very possible . . .