Clan wars 100 person limit

[Clicks]

Many clans have attempted and succeeded in pulling over 100 to iniate in an ultimate, full force battle. However, due to the limit those clans are not able to demonstrate their true force of elite pures and/or mains. I was astonished to see that the limit was not temporarily shifted to a higher limit for the jagex cup. I'm very displeased at that, because those whom pull over 100 must relinquish a chance of showing what their clan in full can accomplish. What if Foe had pulled 125 by some chance to fight LDK? Could've had a higher limit produced an alternative warring method as well as an alternative ending?

 

I'd like to open a discussion towards the limit. Questions that I would like answered are as listed;

 

Foe ultimately had to cap off at 100, although I'm not sure of their pull, what if they had pulled more? Do you think Foe could have overcame the ultimate battle between pures and mains?

*-* Next,

Could've had renown battles such as Foe vs TLP, Foe vs MM, Foe vs Fatality, 100v100 full out fights projected a different outcome with a higher cap?

*-* Next,

Do you feel as if your odds as a clan would differ due to a higher cap whether you have or haven't projected a pull below or above 100?

*-* Next,

Do you feel as a medium level clan, a 100 man limit gives you more of a chance to compete with mainstream clans?

*-* Next,

Do you think Clan Chats should be doubled?

*-* Next,

How would a higher cap effect your clan's state of mind? Positvely or Negatively.

*-* Finally,

Do you think there would be more extravagant turn-outs for clans such as Foe, Fatality, TLP, MM, and EOP due to everyone being able to participate? As some pures may feel that their clan is going to pull 100 that they're not needed.

 

 

What do you think?

[Guest Xihtug7]

we need larger cc's

[Charlie]

A higher cap is good idea in theory but the lag for 100 people is quite bad sometimes, would be luls to see more.

[Jonty]

1) With all due respect, FOE killed about 10-15 of them, i doubt an extra 20 people would have allowed them to kill the extra 40.

 

2) Obviously without the cap the outcomes could have been different, for example seeing as Fi couldn't beat FOE 100v80, maybe another 10 or 20 or whatever they pulled would have been a big enough difference.

 

3) If your projected pull is higher than the other clans, yes..

 

4) The only clans that would pull 100 to a fullout right now are FOE and MM anyway.

 

5) ^

[Juicy J]

Tbh i think 100v100 is as fair as it gets, And really truley proves what clan is better with there 100 of the best vs the other clan 100 best.

[Solo]

1) With all due respect, FOE killed about 10-15 of them, i doubt an extra 20 people would have allowed them to kill the extra 40.

 

2) Obviously without the cap the outcomes could have been different, for example seeing as Fi couldn't beat FOE 100v80, maybe another 10 or 20 or whatever they pulled would have been a big enough difference.

 

3) If your projected pull is higher than the other clans, yes..

 

4) The only clans that would pull 100 to a fullout right now are FOE and MM anyway.

 

5) ^

[Asher]

we wouldnt of won cap or no cap, but yes clanchats should be doubled

[Keyboard Warrior]

think there should be a higher cap, but lag issues may occur.

[Pal]

increasing clanchats would bring clanwars to a point where the lag is unplayable, which jagex probably decided was 100v100

 

theres always the wild, IR + Dv had a perfectly clean war because mm and foe aced it.

[Clicks]

Asher, more members could've potentially gaven Foe a better state of a mind. When you're talking increments of 25 or more, then yes it could project a different outcome. You could have merely intimidated them by having double opts. I'm not saying you would have for sure won, but I think you had potential for a better fight...

[Asher]

Asher, more members could've potentially gaven Foe a better state of a mind. When you're talking increments of 25 or more, then yes it could project a different outcome. You could have merely intimidated them by having double opts. I'm not saying you would have for sure won, but I think you had potential for a better fight...

 

im in foe i know the pull we did not have 20 more sitting outside of cw was like 5

[0wnage]

more people = more lagg, pvp is there for a reason ;)

[Anthoni]

It would be a great idea, but like Charlie said, the lag would be horrible lol.

[Kruckcrusher]

Yes clan chats should be double but then against 100v100 is laggy enough.

[Lamotrigine]

1) With all due respect, FOE killed about 10-15 of them, i doubt an extra 20 people would have allowed them to kill the extra 40.

 

2) Obviously without the cap the outcomes could have been different, for example seeing as Fi couldn't beat FOE 100v80, maybe another 10 or 20 or whatever they pulled would have been a big enough difference.

 

3) If your projected pull is higher than the other clans, yes..

 

4) The only clans that would pull 100 to a fullout right now are FOE and MM anyway.

 

5) ^

not only that but most of the kids they sit out are the lower lvls with low atk, pray or mage.

[walli]

would require larged cwa maps.

[Ded]

100v100 is laggy enough, but if the cw area was way bigger then yeah that would be pretty sick to have 100v100+ fights

[Chris`iDi]

If your pulling 100's in your clans, they've been taking roids.

[Shay]

would require larged cwa maps.

 

Yea, turrets is the only map that could do that right now.

[Shay]

double post fail

[Sean®]

More then 100 is gf computer.

 

Although, would be interesting to see clan's pulls if limit was set to 200.

[Sparatic Gun]

FOE still wouldve lost

[Mateo]

Would be exciting and, yet, frightening to see the race to the first clan to have 200 people at an event after this update.

[Gfed Twins]

I also think clan chats should be doubled for many reasons

[Manaana]

They should of been doubled or 1.5'd a long time ago.